Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes

Some argue that drones strikes help prevent “boots on the ground” combat and makes America safer, that the strikes are legal under American and international law, and that they are carried out with the support of Americans and foreign governments, while others argue that drone strikes kill civilians, creating more terrorists than they kill and sowing animosity in foreign countries, that the strikes are extrajudicial and illegal, and create a dangerous disconnect between the horrors of war and soldiers carrying out the strikes.

Drone strikes threaten 50 years of international law, says UN rapporteur, Drones (military)

We Need Arms Control on Drones

U.S. Drone Strikes Violate International Law, Reports Allege : The Two-Way : NPR

Day of the Drone: We Need an International Convention on Drones - FPIF

The Psychological Tolls and Moral Hazards of Drone Warfare

The Pros & Cons of Drones in Counterterrorism

Drone Strikes Abroad - Pros & Cons - ProCon.org

How to Fly a Drone

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), Definition, History, Types, & Facts

What to know about the Iranian drones Russia is using to attack Ukraine - ABC News

Military drones are swarming the skies of Ukraine and other conflict hot spots – and anything goes when it comes to international law

Targeted Killing, Pro and Con: What to Make of U.S. Drone Strikes in Pakistan - The Atlantic

Why Barack Obama ramped up drone strikes from George W. Bush Institute of International Relations Prague - Expertise to impact

Drone Strike!: UCAVs and Unmanned Aerial Warfare in the 21st Century: Yenne, Bill: 9781580072380: : Books